Final Task- Implementing Peer Review Feedback

Hello Everyone! Welcome back to todays blog! Todays topic is going to be focused mainly about tweaking the Final Task in response to a previous peer review. Upon receiving the review, it became apparent that several adjustments were needed to elevate the sequence to its full potential. Firstly, a emphasized the importance of pacing, suggesting that slowing down transitions between scenes would heighten tension and create a more immersive experience for the audience. In response to this feedback, the sequence was reexamined, refining transitions and allowing key moments to breathe, thereby intensifying the sense of dread and anticipation. But also not too much as to go over the Final Tasks time limit. Typography and title card placement was the next topic addressed. Recommendations to enhance readability and placement of titles. By exploring positions and layouts, I found success in creating  new title cards that were not only striking but also seamlessly integrated into the sequence. Next up was feedback on narrative clarity to heart. Time was spent reevaluating the sequence to ensure that every shot served a purpose in advancing the story. No time in the film was to be waisted on garbage. This led to a more cohesive and engaging narrative arc. Throughout this process, the revised intro title sequence emerged as a testament to the power of collaboration and iteration in the creative process. By embracing feedback and making thoughtful adjustments, the film succeeded in enhancing the horror experience. I truly feel as that the new and refurbished Final Task has seen great improvement. Especially in the area of the titles. They were a mess before but this method of revision has cleared them up nicely and properly. That's all the time I have today. 

It was a pleasure, goodbye.

ANTON F

(A picture of the editing process)